Skip to content
Thursday, October 29, 2026 · Today’s edition, 6:30 a.m. ETThu, Oct 29 · 6:30 a.m. editionSign inMy Desk 0EditionsSign in

Kitces article: prospects want the firm's fees and minimums, testimonials on websites

Sydney Squires describes two rounds of screening, and a cited report finds even referred prospects leave a site that cannot answer their questions.

At a glance

  1. If a site cannot answer a question, a referred prospect will go to another firm that can.
  2. Senior financial planning nerd Sydney Squires writes that prospects use two rounds of criteria.
  3. Most prospects are looking for the firm's fees and minimums, demonstrations of the advisor's expertise, including reviews and testimonials, the nature of the investment strategies, and an overview of the discovery process.

The overwhelming majority of referred prospects will leave a financial advisor's website if it cannot answer their questions, according to a marketing report cited in an Oct. 12 article by Kitces's Nerd's Eye View. If a site cannot answer a question, a referred prospect will go to another firm that can.

Senior financial planning nerd Sydney Squires writes that prospects use two rounds of criteria. They first look for firms with must-have traits, such as the CFP designation; they then eliminate firms using personal criteria like location and pricing.

Most prospects are looking for the firm's fees and minimums, demonstrations of the advisor's expertise, including reviews and testimonials, the nature of the investment strategies, and an overview of the discovery process. A few pages on a firm's website can cover all of it, Squires writes; the work is presenting it in a clear, prospect-friendly manner.

The article also suggests advisors use basic website analytics—who visits, how long they spend and which pages they open—so they can evaluate marketing beyond the prospects who book a call.

Reported by the Practice management desk from Kitces — Nerd's Eye View. Published . Corrections

Related

Advisors

Complexity pricing is how flat-fee advisors scale

A Kitces analysis finds flat-fee hourly advice nets about $100 an hour after unbillable work. The fix is pricing for complexity, not abandoning the model.

Advisors

The $100-an-hour tax on flat-fee advice

A Kitces analysis finds flat-fee hourly pricing nets about $100 an hour, and the first step to repricing by complexity is a month of time tracking.

Advisors

AI will make financial advice more human, column argues

Cheaper analysis and personalization spread capabilities once held by the largest firms, leaving adviser judgment as the differentiator.

Advisors

Kitces & Carl discuss fee caps for clients paying above schedule

Episode 202 weighs accepting the higher fee or setting a maximum to keep one client schedule.

Advisors

Hackers used AI agents against over 2,250 Microsoft 365 organizations

The NSA, with NIST and CISA, released guidance for organizations preparing for and managing AI-related control incidents.

Wealth Advisor Dailyfrom Private Wealth Daily

Practice management, recruiting, RIA M&A and the platforms advisors run on. Daily at 6:45 a.m. ET.

Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.

From other sections