At a glance
- MADE holds U.S.-based companies heavily engaged in manufacturing and has gained 17.88% through July 31, while BATT targets companies deriving significant revenue from the lithium battery industry and has gained 16.45% on a NAV basis through Aug. 26.
- Fresh tariff threats tend to raise prices on imported goods and raw materials, and companies that have already moved production back to the U.S. need less international shipping, which means less exposure to those rising costs.
- MADE is the straightforward option, targeted domestic manufacturing exposure tied to the reshoring process; BATT is the supply-chain option, leaning into lithium batteries, battery storage, and clean energy's broader buildout.
The two ETFs built to capture reshoring are both up double digits this year, and the near-identical returns obscure two very different mandates. MADE holds U.S.-based companies heavily engaged in manufacturing and has gained 17.88% through July 31, while BATT targets companies deriving significant revenue from the lithium battery industry and has gained 16.45% on a NAV basis through Aug. 26. The shared thread is tariff math, not the growth story reshoring was marketed as.
Fresh tariff threats tend to raise prices on imported goods and raw materials, and companies that have already moved production back to the U.S. need less international shipping, which means less exposure to those rising costs. The federal policy push is explicit: the Chips & Science Act funnels incentives to semiconductors, the Inflation Reduction Act funnels them to clean energy, and the industrials sector is absorbing the manufacturing side of the trend.
MADE is the straightforward option, targeted domestic manufacturing exposure tied to the reshoring process; BATT is the supply-chain option, leaning into lithium batteries, battery storage, and clean energy's broader buildout. Their mandates differ in a way that matters: MADE anchors on U.S. domicile, while BATT anchors on the battery industry itself, wherever the revenue sits. An advisor allocating to both is making two calls: that U.S. industrial capacity gets repriced, and that clean-energy supply chains get rebuilt without relying on foreign input. They share the tariff hedge logic but not the country risk.
Tariff exposure runs in different directions. MADE's domestic manufacturers still buy inputs, and BATT's battery companies still sell into a global commodity market; the funds' own materials describe the holdings as less exposed rather than immune. Position sizing should treat them as strategic sleeves rather than all-weather core.
The near-identical returns — 17.88% and 16.45% — come from two very different sector bets, and investors are paying for tariff insulation in both at roughly comparable rates. That is a deliberate defensive allocation, a hedge built on the expectation that tariff headlines are not going away, available in two flavors and priced about the same. The ETF wrapper makes the rotation easy; when policy shifts from semiconductors to batteries or back, the trade can follow without changing vehicles.
Reported by The Tape desk from ETF Trends. Published . Corrections