At a glance
- In a softening market, that mix is less a sign the cycle has turned than a bet that conventional pricing keeps improving, because cedents reach for structures once the last points of rate are worth less than the volatility attached and capital relief today beats waiting on a better curve.
- The two directions carry different information.
- The alternative-capital piece deserves more attention than the demand headline.
Ed Hochberg, who runs global structured solutions at Marsh Re, described growing demand for structured reinsurance written prospectively and retrospectively, for legacy risk solutions, and for an evolving role for alternative capital, according to an AM Best News account published Sept. 18. In a softening market, that mix is less a sign the cycle has turned than a bet that conventional pricing keeps improving, because cedents reach for structures once the last points of rate are worth less than the volatility attached and capital relief today beats waiting on a better curve.
The two directions carry different information. A prospective structure covers business not yet written and amounts to capacity substitution: bespoke, often cheaper than the conventional layer it displaces, and increasingly funded by third-party capital rather than a reinsurer's own balance sheet. Retrospective and legacy transactions work the other way, against risk already incurred, and the seller there is buying finality — a closed underwriting year, a released reserve, a cleaner capital position going into the next one. One is a bet on future pricing; the other is a verdict on reserving already done.
The alternative-capital piece deserves more attention than the demand headline. As this publication has argued, the fastest-growing sleeve of permanent capital runs through structures that put a balance sheet at the center of an asset manager's pitch without requiring ownership of the whole insurer, and sidecars are where that shows up first. Structured solutions is less a product line than a channel for third-party capital; the competitive question moves from size to collateral: who can post it, at what terms, and against what documentation when a loss lands.
The AM Best account carries no volumes and no terms, so the demand Hochberg describes cannot be sized from anything public in it, and the rates at which these structures clear over the next renewal will be the first hard evidence either way. If that expectation is wrong, the retrospective cover placed now will look expensive inside a year, and the alternative capital behind it will be the first to reprice.
Reported by the Cat bonds & reinsurance desk from AM Best News. Published . Corrections