Is Your 40% in Bonds Losing to Inflation? Aptus CIO Makes the Case for an Options-Based Approach
For wealth professionals reviewing 60/40 assumptions, the video presents a manager's case for options-based ETF exposure and a framework for comparing buffer funds. It is relevant to portfolio construction discussions and product due diligence.
Summary
By the bonds & fixed income deskIn an ETF.com video, Aptus founder and CIO JD Gardner argues that the common 40% bond allocation rests on flawed assumptions about bonds protecting equities and delivering real returns. He traces 60/40 to a period when rates fell from 17% to zero, discusses a fiscal deficit as a more honest hurdle rate for bonds than CPI, and describes holding more stocks and fewer bonds while keeping drawdown risk in check. The conversation also covers options-based ETFs and buffer ETFs, including what advisors should compare when choosing buffer funds.
- Gardner argues that the assumptions bonds will protect equities and deliver real returns are flawed.
- He says the 60/40 model was born in an era of rates falling from 17% to zero.
- He sees a fiscal deficit as a more honest hurdle rate for bonds than CPI.
- He discusses options-based ETFs and what to compare when choosing buffer funds.
Similar items
Same topic UK Budget 2026: What It Means for Gilts, Interest Rates & Equities | Macro Moments | FTFranklin Templeton |
Mind the $2 Trillion Gap | WiWisdomTree |
Quality, Liquidity, and Yield in Agency Mortgages | PIPIMCO |
Diversifying Globally Without Giving Up Yield | PIPIMCO |
Joseph Moore: The Investments That Matter Most May Not Be in Your Portfolio | LVThe Long View (Morningstar) |
Get the weekly 3 to watch
Free, in the Morning BriefEvery week the Morning Brief picks three videos and podcasts worth your time, with why each one matters.
Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.
Videos and podcasts are embedded from their publishers. Selections and summaries are editorial and are not investment advice.




