Bonds & fixed income
PNQIInvescoINDEX
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
$50.70-0.58% vs prior close
435752-WK
Price through Oct 27, 2026 · Flows through Oct 26, 2026. Figures use the latest available records, not a live quote. Fund details retrieved Oct 27, 2026. Holdings snapshot retrieved Oct 27, 2026.
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to track the performance of companies engaged in Internet-related businesses that are listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), NYSE American, Cboe Exchange ("Cboe") or The Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq"). The fund is non-diversified.
PNQI price
Source: Market tape, daily closes; price return, distributions not reinvested
Table
| Date | PNQI close |
|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | $50.41 |
| Sep 29, 2026 | $50.55 |
| Sep 30, 2026 | $50.74 |
| Oct 1, 2026 | $50.57 |
| Oct 2, 2026 | $50.72 |
| Oct 5, 2026 | $51.44 |
| Oct 6, 2026 | $51.58 |
| Oct 7, 2026 | $51.62 |
| Oct 8, 2026 | $51.92 |
| Oct 9, 2026 | $52.58 |
| Oct 12, 2026 | $52.90 |
| Oct 13, 2026 | $53.02 |
| Oct 14, 2026 | $52.30 |
| Oct 15, 2026 | $53.37 |
| Oct 16, 2026 | $52.17 |
| Oct 19, 2026 | $52.45 |
| Oct 20, 2026 | $52.52 |
| Oct 21, 2026 | $52.31 |
| Oct 22, 2026 | $51.99 |
| Oct 23, 2026 | $51.53 |
| Oct 26, 2026 | $50.99 |
| Oct 27, 2026 | $50.70 |
Daily net flows, 1M
Net outflow over the range: −$1M
- Inflow / above zero
- Outflow / below zero
Source: Daily creation and redemption records
Show as table
| Label | Value ($) |
|---|---|
| Sep 28 | $0 |
| Sep 29 | $0 |
| Sep 30 | $0 |
| Oct 1 | $0 |
| Oct 2 | $0 |
| Oct 5 | −$510K |
| Oct 6 | $0 |
| Oct 7 | $0 |
| Oct 8 | $0 |
| Oct 9 | $0 |
| Oct 12 | $0 |
| Oct 13 | $0 |
| Oct 14 | $0 |
| Oct 16 | −$530K |
| Oct 19 | $0 |
| Oct 20 | $0 |
| Oct 21 | $0 |
| Oct 22 | $0 |
| Oct 23 | $0 |
| Oct 26 | $0 |
The desk’s read
Money is leaving — −$1M in net outflows over the past month, about 0.2% of the fund's asset base, while the price has returned -6.0% so far this year. At 0.60% a year it is not the cheapest way in — IVV has a reported fee of 0.03%.
COMPOSED FROM THE FUND’S OWN DAILY RECORDS · UPDATED WITH EACH REFRESH
$534Massets under management
0.60%expense ratio · $60 per $10,000 a year
−$1Mnet flow, trailing month
23Kavg daily volume, 30 days
81holdings · US-domiciled
2008listed June 12, 2008 · beta 1.01
The book at a glance
CELL SIZE IS PORTFOLIO WEIGHT · COLOR IS THE CHANGE IN THE LATEST AVAILABLE SNAPSHOT · TOP 40 POSITIONS
Holdings
| # | Holding | Weight | Price | Day | 52-wk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPLAPPLE | 8.90% | $347.10 | +0.9% | ||
| 2 | METAMETA | 9.11% | $620.19 | -1.6% | ||
| 3 | MSFTMICROSOFT | 8.39% | $531.33 | -0.2% | ||
| 4 | AMZNAMAZON | 7.74% | $253.10 | +1.6% | ||
| 5 | GOOGALPHABET | 7.67% | $316.83 | +0.8% | ||
| 6 | SHOPSHOPIFY | 4.64% | $165.81 | -1.4% | ||
| 7 | DISWALT DISNEY | 4.24% | $110.23 | -0.2% | ||
| 8 | CRMSALESFORCE | 3.91% | $240.89 | -2.7% | ||
| 9 | UBERUBER | 3.57% | $65.78 | -0.5% | ||
| 10 | NFLXNETFLIX | 3.30% | $62.52 | -2.2% | ||
| 11 | SPOTSPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY SA | 3.17% | $555.45 | -3.0% | ||
| 12 | BKNGBOOKING HOLDINGS | 3.08% | $150.14 | -2.0% | ||
| 13 | ADBEADOBE | 2.76% | $248.36 | -4.0% | ||
| 14 | INTUINTUIT | 2.48% | $328.45 | -3.4% | ||
| 15 | MELIMERCADOLIBRE | 2.42% | $1680.51 | +0.7% |
The full book, free with one sign-in.
Top 15 positions are open to everyone. Sign in once and every fund’s complete holdings — plus watchlists and flow alerts — unlock across the network.
Sign in to see all 81Sector weights
- Technology Services57.95%
- Information Technology38.67%
- Technology37.83%
- Communication Services30.74%
- Consumer Cyclical26.59%
- Consumer Discretionary25.12%
- Retail Trade17.16%
- Consumer Services13.1%
- Transportation6.67%
- Financials3.76%
Source: Portfolio composition, latest disclosure
Show as table
| Item | Value (%) |
|---|---|
| Technology Services | 57.95% |
| Information Technology | 38.67% |
| Technology | 37.83% |
| Communication Services | 30.74% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 26.59% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 25.12% |
| Retail Trade | 17.16% |
| Consumer Services | 13.1% |
| Transportation | 6.67% |
| Financials | 3.76% |
Country weights
- United States90.34%
- Hong Kong11.38%
- China4.47%
- Brazil3.42%
- Uruguay2.96%
- Luxembourg2.32%
- Korea (the Republic of)1.12%
- Singapore0.87%
Source: Portfolio composition, latest disclosure
Show as table
| Item | Value (%) |
|---|---|
| United States | 90.34% |
| Hong Kong | 11.38% |
| China | 4.47% |
| Brazil | 3.42% |
| Uruguay | 2.96% |
| Luxembourg | 2.32% |
| Korea (the Republic of) | 1.12% |
| Singapore | 0.87% |
Performance
| 1 week | -3.1% |
| 1 month | -1.2% |
| 3 months | +6.4% |
| 6 months | +3.7% |
| YTD | -6.0% |
| 1 year | -10.9% |
| 3 years | — |
PRICE RETURN, DISTRIBUTIONS NOT REINVESTED
Net flows
| 1 week | — |
| 1 month | −$1M |
| 3 months | −$15M |
| YTD | −$195M |
| 1 year | −$195M |
CREATION/REDEMPTION DOLLARS, DAILY RECORDS
Monthly net flows
- Inflow / above zero
- Outflow / below zero
Source: Daily creation/redemption records, trailing twelve months
Show as table
| Label | Value ($) |
|---|---|
| Aug | −$8M |
| Sep | −$6M |
| Oct | $0 |
| Feb | −$112.2M |
| Mar | −$16.4M |
| Apr | −$15.3M |
| May | −$13.9M |
| Jun | −$8.8M |
| Jul | −$29.6M |
| Aug | $50K |
| Sep | $2M |
| Oct | −$1M |
The risk read
16%realized volatility, 30 days (annualized)
21%realized volatility, 1 year
-24.7%deepest fall from a peak, 1 year
-11.0%latest close versus that peak
The top holding is 9.1% of the book; the top ten carry 61%. Spread across 78+ names, it behaves like roughly 20 equally-weighted positions.
VOLATILITY & DRAWDOWN FROM THE DAILY TAPE · CONCENTRATION FROM THE LATEST DISCLOSED BOOK
Options tape
—calls · latest snapshot
—puts · latest snapshot
—put/call ratio
25Kshares traded
| Most-traded holdings, options premium | Bullish | Bearish |
|---|---|---|
| META META | $390M | $357M |
| AAPL APPLE | $181M | $199M |
| AMZN AMAZON | $188M | $152M |
| MSFT MICROSOFT | $118M | $120M |
| GOOG ALPHABET | $64M | $61M |
TODAY’S OPTIONS PREMIUM IN THE FUND’S UNDERLYING NAMES
The case against PNQI
Due diligence cuts both ways. These funds sit on the same shelf and beat PNQI on at least one dimension that matters — the fee, the asset base, or where the money is going.
| Fund | Fee | Assets | Flow, 1M | The case | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.02% | $9.6B | +$187M | -58bp on fee · 18× the assets · +$187M in over the month | Head-to-head |
| SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.04% | $57.9B | +$717M | -56bp on fee · 108× the assets · +$717M in over the month | Head-to-head |
| SPTM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 0.03% | $14.2B | +$235M | -57bp on fee · 27× the assets · +$235M in over the month | Head-to-head |
| IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.04% | $34.8B | +$148M | -56bp on fee · 65× the assets · +$148M in over the month | Head-to-head |
| IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 0.04% | $27.3B | +$223M | -56bp on fee · 51× the assets · +$223M in over the month | Head-to-head |